More News

June 9 Supervisor Meeting to Discuss new Power Company to Provide Renewable Energy

Meeting will be held at county Board of Supervisors' chambers to inform public about formation of Monterey Bay Community Power that would provide renewable energy
Supervisor Jerry Muenzer said he was enthusiastic about the potential for solar.
Marty Richman warned the board not to be enthusiastic, but ask tough questions.

Residents of San Benito County are encouraged to attend a community study session with the board of supervisors and staff June 9, 3-5:30 p.m. concerning the formation of Monterey Bay Community Power (MBCP), a regional project designed to provide electricity to residents and businesses throughout Monterey, San Benito and Santa Cruz counties.

A feasibility study was announced May 3 that validates the suitability of creating this new regional power agency that would provide renewable energy and create green jobs, according to a MBCP press release.

The release stated that in accordance to California’s 2002 Community Choice Energy (CCE) law a committee, which was made up of representatives from Santa Cruz, San Benito and Monterey Counties, determined that a new agency would enable as many as 285,000 residential and business customers to choose clean-source power at a cost equivalent to PG&E, while retaining PG&E’s role in maintaining power lines and providing customer service. The new agency will be financially self-sustaining and would come at no cost to local government.

The feasibility study found that in creating a CCE agency there is the possibility of:

·         Increasing the local power portfolio of renewables by more than twice what is now offered by PG&E, and reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by purchasing energy that is at least 70% GHG free.

·         Developing a long-term strategic goal of 100 percent regional energy self-sufficiency by building out local renewable generation projects, using revenue surplus that would otherwise have gone to PG&E shareholders.

·         Creating numerous construction jobs for renewable energy build-out, many permanent operations and maintenance jobs, and nearly $1.4 billion in total economic output.

·         Offering complementary programs that serve community interests, such as net metering, comprehensive energy efficiency retrofits, community solar, electric vehicle charging, and support for local training programs.

“In keeping with our strong environmental values, we have in Monterey Bay Community Power the most meaningful chance in a generation to impact climate change,” Bruce McPherson, a Santa Cruz County supervisor, stated in the release. “The idea that we can reduce greenhouse gas emissions by increasing renewable energy at the same rates customers are currently paying for PG&E is game-changing.”

San Benito County Supervisor Jerry Muenzer said in the release: “The job creation potential represented by Monterey Bay Community Power is exciting. The money saved by transitioning to a locally-controlled model will allow us to build and sustain solar and other renewable energy projects right here in our own community.”

According to the executive summary of the technical study, the CCE program would provide electric generation service to residential and business customers the three counties and 21 cities, including:  Capitola, Carmel, Del Rey Oaks, Gonzales, Greenfield, Hollister, King City, Marina, Monterey, Pacific Grove, Salinas, San Juan Bautista, Sand City, Santa Cruz, Scotts Valley, Seaside, Soledad and Watsonville (together, the “MBCP Communities”).

“The study sessions provide a great opportunity to get engaged in a project that will improve accountability and transparency in the delivery of our electricity,” said Salinas City Councilman Steve McShane. “From the coastline to the valleys, Monterey Bay Community Power has the potential to increase regional resilience by determining the mix of energy available to ratepayers.”

Virginia Johnson, a county supervisor’s analyst for McPherson, told the San Benito County Board of Supervisors at the May 10 meeting that similar agencies have been established around the state and have proved to be helpful environmentally and economically.

“The reason we’ve investigated this is we wanted to see what benefits that we could bring to our region for local control over our electricity rates, more transparent accountability,” she said, “citizens can come before a local board to discuss rate settings, and where they want renewable energy projects. It also allows us greater use of solar, wind and biomass in our area for a greater reduction of greenhouse gases.”

She said half of greenhouses gas comes from where electricity comes from.

“If we can make that electricity more renewable it offers us the opportunity to lower our greenhouse gases by 50 percent,” she said. “The economic vitality piece of this is incredibly important. Because of the redirected revenue to the local agency, it allows the board to create local renewable projects, which create local jobs.”

The supervisors said they had many questions they wanted to ask, but decided to hold off until the June 9 meeting. But Muenzer said he was excited about the program and stressed that the end users can opt to participate in the program or remain with PG&E.

“It’s going to be a great opportunity for San Benito County to be a leader in solar production because our partner agencies do not have as much sun as we do, so we’re going to produce electricity for both Santa Cruz and Monterey counties,” Muenzer said. “I believe other counties and agencies that got involved with this have had money to be able to do rooftop solar on their own government buildings. The possibilities are endless.”

While the board expressed their enthusiasm for the potential of the project, Hollister resident Marty Richman brought the mood back to a degree of equilibrium with the caveat: “I’m for this, and everybody knows that, but I get nervous when Supervisor Muenzer says he’s enthusiastic. Do me a favor, don’t get enthusiastic. We’ve been had before on solar energy.”

Richman strongly advised the board to, “read the contract.”

“I want you to be skeptical and ask tough questions. It’s easy to throw these guys a softball and believe everything they say,” he said. “And you know we’re not going to be able to supply any solar energy because we’re going to be sued the first time you try to put up a panel that is not on top of somebody’s roof. If you don’t believe me look at what’s going on down in Panoche Valley, where we have the sun, the transmission line and we’re ready to go, but we’ve got the idiots in Santa Clara suing us again because they want to come down here and watch the birds. The idea that we’ll build acres and acres of solar panels and nobody will care is ridiculous.”

The CCE model helps ensure local economic vitality because money from rates paid by local customers stays local, which helps to fund renewable energy projects, create jobs and stimulate the economy. For more information, visit:  www.mbcommunitypower.org.

About:
John Chadwell (John Chadwell)

Former U.S. Navy Combat Photojournalist. Award-winning writer for magazine, newspapers, radio and television. BA in Journalism and Mass Communications from Chapman University. Graduate studies at USC Cinema School. Also, author of eight novels, copywriter and scriptwriter.

Comments

Submitted by Tod DuBois (John Galt) on

Marty makes an interesting point. The CCA sounds cool but where is the electricity actually generated? How does the CCA buy power locally for so many homes? If they buy solar power from a solar farm in San Bernardino or Arizona does that mean it is local renewable power? Wind power from Livermore? Water power from San Luis Dam? Is San Luis Dam actually renewable energy? 

Great questions! At first, Monterey Bay Community Power would buy solar, wind and other renewables from the same resources as PG&E does now on the open energy market. The goal will still be to buy as much locally generated energy as possible, but there is not enough available from local resources right now to serve our needs. Monterey Bay Community Power would provide incentives for local property owners to install solar, etc., and eventually the agency could invest surplus revenues into large projects that will move the region toward energy self-sufficiency. Hope that helps!

Add new comment

Add Facebook comment

Comment using your Facebook account. Facebook comments will be published on this page, and on Facebook. It will not be posted to the "Recent Comments" list on the BenitoLink front page.