More Opinion

COMMUNITY OPINION: Why more people do not run for public office

Many successful business people, the kind we need in elected positions, do not run for office. An ugly letter received by a candidate demonstrates why.
Letter threatening a candidate for supervisor's business. Photo provided.

This opinion was contributed by Rob Bernosky. The opinions expressed do not necessarily represent BenitoLink or other affiliated contributors.

Being an elected board member (school board, hospital board, city council, board of supervisors) mostly involves business decisions. The product (government services) and the infrastructure that supports it, must be paid for. Those funds are not unlimited and fluctuate. Striking a balance between paying for services today and saving for repairs and downturns later is a learned skill.

People who own or run businesses should make good elected officials; most have had to deal with boom and bust cycles, personnel issues, regulatory nightmares, borrowing and paying back money, contracts, thefts, and dealing with problems of every other sort on a regular basis, and they survive.  They have learned from the school of hard knocks, know what they would and would not do again.

But a great deal of successful people will not run for office and use their valuable skills for the public good because their livelihoods are put at risk by those who have different agendas. I have heard this over and over again as I encourage people to run.

As the nearby letter shows, a worthy candidate for County Supervisor has his business being threatened. Peter Hernandez is currently a well-serving and accomplished member of the Hollister School Board and was using his successful business skills in shaping long-term commitments of the Hollister School District – the largest government entity and employer in the County. He was steadfast in dealing with the ugly personnel issue we had and a voice of reason in our litigation involving missing and unaccounted for funds with the County.

As a member of the governing board of the Hollister School District, I can tell you that there are real threats on the horizon. The Governor is continuously sending warning signs that state funding is at risk. Pension payments for employees are dramatically increasing and crowding out our ability to deliver the services a school district is supposed to be delivering. Potential litigation issues are up. The loss of our superintendent creates uncertainty as does three positions being up for election.

When the Hollister School District recently had to make contract decisions with our unions, some cautiousness was warranted. I cannot divulge what was said in closed session where contract negotiations are discussed between school board members and our negotiating team. However, I can tell you generically we have to weigh being competitive in compensation, and having reserves to weather the pending storm of budget and pension payments, when bargaining. Knowing Peter Hernandez like I do, I can surmise he wanted more information and did not want the pending departure of our superintendent to be a reason to rush, so he voted “nay”.

So, instead of being rewarded for wanting to do things right, he received the ugly letter presented here. What business person would want to add that to their list of trying to run a business honorably and profitably? You can fight back by visiting Peter Hernandez's business.

Not voting with your fellow board members takes courage; I know. It can make you feel like going against family members because of the relationships that build between board members, and you worry about how it is going to be portrayed in the press. But isn’t that what true leadership is, being bold in questioning and wanting to do what is right instead of popular? I am sure Peter Hernandez was not voting against the teachers; he was voting for them by making sure we had the funds to pay them today and when our funding is cut, and be able to continue to pay their retirement! It is also important to note that whomever wrote the letter knows that the teachers got the raises they bargained for.

This article is not meant to promote the candidate mentioned in this article, but to ask readers to reflect on why our roads are broken and crowded, why we do not have enough police and fire resources, why we are about to lose our hospital, and why in general, government is not working for us. We simply are not electing the right people, and the nearby letter is a significant reason why.

 

 

BenitoLink Logo

Become a Member Today

Support your local independent news.

We work hard to give you the news and information you need. By becoming a member, you will be part of something bigger; BenitoLink, your community-supported news source.

Donate

About:
Rob Bernosky (thepracticalcon...)

Rob Bernosky is a chief financial officer, Regional Vice Chair for the California Republican Party, and is an elected school board member of the Hollister School District. He formerly served as a member and secretary of the Citizens' Oversight Committee for the Hollister School District. Rob is a former elected trustee of the North County Joint Union School District, and has served on numerous other boards, including the Heritage Foundation of San Benito County, a local water company, chairman of the San Benito County Republican Party, and was a member and president of the San Benito County Committee on School District Organization. Rob is married with 3 children, including 2 who are teachers in public schools and 1 in college.

Comments

Welcome to the world of take-no-prisoner politics where it's all personal.  Not surprisingly the letter is anonymous as was the thinly-veiled death threat I received over my attempt to get the fireworks laws enforced.

Naturally, the author makes no argument as to why Mr. Hernandez should support a teachers' salary increase, no reference to the condition of the budget (who cares if the money is not there or we bet the farm on an uncertain future?), nothing that could possibly change his mind; instead they threaten his business which the writer admits is a "great asset to the entire community"..  So the logic is if we kill the business and reduce the tax intake, THAT will get the teacher's a raise.

The education system is not private enterprise, not one pockets the unspent funds, it goes to support the system!

And if that threat does not work, what's the next step, a demonstration at his home, a rock through the window, or maybe a little gun paly?  Follow his family around to a restaurant and harass them is certainly on the list somewhere.

The writer claims that Hernandez lost a business award over this vote - not that his business had not earned it.

Whoever you are, if you cannot take the time and do not have the intellect to even try and convince someone that you deserve a raise, why would anyone listen to you?  This is not the Greensboro, North Carolina lunch counter sit-in, this is just a mindless, cowardly, ingrate trying to extort an elected official.  I'm sure whoever it is represents very few other teachers, if any.

Marty Richman

 

Submitted by (Franz M. Schneider) on

I'm very much not a fan of anonymous political commentary.  I've seen it do much damage in this community.  (Besides, now we have just as nasty political comments made in social media by people who proudly sign their names, but that's another issue.)  I'm also glad that both Mr. Bernovsky and Mr. Richman did not attribute the anonymous letter to any teachers.  I doubt very much that any teachers were involved in its writing.

 

I don’t support this type behavior and I doubt many do. I hope the business sees more customers as a result of this threat. Like Franz I highly doubt an educator wrote this. There is just no excuse for this attack. See you at Ohana’s. Come on down and support your downtown and this “cool” business. 

Add new comment

Add Facebook comment

Comment using your Facebook account. Facebook comments will be published on this page, and on Facebook. It will not be posted to the "Recent Comments" list on the BenitoLink front page.