At the April 17 meeting Supervisor Jerry Muenzer took his usual election year swipe at out-of-town developers over fees and roads. I guess he forgot that the county has been paying a pile in legal fees trying to defend an in-town developer and former member of the Board caught in a development conflict-of-interest scandal that occurred while he was in office. .
It also apparently slipped Jerry’s mind that it was his own votes and maneuvering that helped eliminate the Route 25 widening project impact fees for approximately 5-years and added more than a decade, perhaps two, and millions of dollars to the cost of its ultimate completion.
The public should be asking who benefited from the votes that stopped collecting Route 25 widening impact fees from new development? Certainly not the majority of county residents and why did Jerry Muenzer lead the charge to keep it that way?
What happened to the widening project is a perfect example of how politicians manipulate the system. In 2011 Supervisor Muenzer and other members voted to stop collecting impact fees for the Route 25 widening project as part of the Traffic Impact Fee Mitigation Study.
That vote also automatically removed it from the Caltrans active project list even though it was a major project in the 2010 Regional Transportation Plan only a year before and Caltrans had identified the route concept in the Transportation Concept Report (TCRP) as a 4-lane rural highway from the Santa Clara County Line to San Felipe Road.
That no-fee situation remained for about five years because in 2014 when he had a chance to correct that bad decision, Supervisor Muenzer moved heaven and earth – including removing the Board’s COG representative - to keep the project off the active list. No project – no fees.
Instead of the widening project, the Board inserted a phony placeholder, two one-half-mile passing lanes; a start from scratch idea designed to never go anywhere and that’s exactly what happened; you’ve probably never even heard of it. The baseless excuse for killing the widening was that the county did not have a funding mechanism for the project, but neither did they have a funding mechanism for the passing lanes and they even admitted that the passing lanes would not bring Route 25 to the required level of service.
Now Supervisor Muenzer wants to use the road’s problems – problems he made worse – as an issue in his reelection campaign. He is certainly not the only local political leader to try and choke the county by stifling its transportation needs, but his actions were especially egregious and he believes he can benefit from the problem he helped create. Well, let’s give him credit for nerve.
Add Facebook comment
Comment using your Facebook account. Facebook comments will be published on this page, and on Facebook. It will not be posted to the "Recent Comments" list on the BenitoLink front page.