Lea este artículo en español aquí.
The American Masters documentary “American Pachuco: The Legend of Luis Valdez,” an in-depth look at the life and work of the iconic playwright, filmmaker, social activist and National Medal of Arts awardee who calls San Juan Bautista his home, will be screened at El Teatro Campesino on June 13, 14, 27 and 28.
Based on 24 hours of interviews with Valdez, 85, conducted by director David Alvarado, the film is narrated by Edward James Olmos in character as Valdez’s “El Pachuco” from “Zoot Suit,” against a background of in-person interviews and contemporary footage, much of it drawn from 80,000 feet of newly restored film covering the history of the theater company.
Besides Valdez, we hear from many in the Teatro sphere, including Olmos, Dolores Huerta, Lupe Valdez, Daniel Valdez, Phil Esparza, Cheech Marin, Linda Ronstadt, Lou Diamond Phillips and many other past and present members of the famed theater family. There is also a restored 1973 conversation between Valdez and the legendary British theater director Peter Brook.
The documentary, which will make its broadcast premiere on PBS this fall, has already received significant critical appreciation, including two awards at the Sundance Film Festival, where it premiered in January: the Audience Award: U.S. Documentary and Festival Favorite Award. Evidence of its popular appeal can also be found in its perfect 100% score on Rotten Tomatoes.
The film was also awarded the 2026 Library of Congress Lavine Ken Burns Prize for Film, where it was recognized for the skill with which its “vibrant storytelling weaves together events across the last half of the 20th century, and the exploration of the successes and failures in the long career of Luis Valdez.”
The following are excerpts from a conversation with Valdez in which he offers insights into his life, his plays and his films, the early days of El Teatro Campesino, the making of the documentary and the larger themes that have informed his influential body of work.
BenitoLink: How does it feel to have such an in-depth film made about you?
Valdez: I had been waiting. I knew we were compiling quite an archive of material on the Teatro’s founding. It needed to be documented in some way besides books. It needed to be really put on film because of the nature of the work, representing a period in this little bit of American history that we’ve been part of.
David Alvarado expressed the right enthusiasm. Films are very specific works of art. They’re a lot more deceptive than people realize, and a lot simpler, because you’re talking about pictures, and yet the pictures have to be put in proper order, and there’s a storyline that has to do with human nature.
I was very fortunate that Alvarado found the balance between the negative and the positive, and I think that’s really important. There are others who have recorded the history of the Teatro and my personal involvement in more negative ways. That’s okay too because we’re all negative and positive. I’m glad that my instinct told me to choose him, and it worked out for us.
How active was your participation in molding the documentary itself?
We talked. We had an initial interview, and then he kept coming back for two years. He thought he had it all in the can, but the more I talked, the more it grew for him. Then he faced the challenge of distilling all this info into a single documentary film. I found his take to be honest and positive, and that’s really important for the subject at hand. The film, consequently, is more of an upper than a downer. But I felt I had to be honest about certain negative things.
I enjoyed the restored footage, which really shows how active and vibrant the early performances were.
Well, the company was raw to begin with. You’ve got to understand we were improvising everything. I was an English major with an emphasis in playwriting, which had introduced me to the theater of the 1930s and the revolutionary theater of the Mexican Revolution. These were like models for me in a sense, thinking, “Okay, what can I do? What do I want to do?”
If you’re performing for farmworkers, it better be highly entertaining and very physical. It can be subtle because they’re just as witty as anybody else. You can do wordplay, but in our case, we had to contend not only with Mexican farmworkers but also with Filipino farmworkers. So, English became a necessity. We had to be bilingual from the beginning.
That drove the work in a certain direction. It made us agitprop, and I was happy to do that because that’s what it needed at the moment. We needed to excite people. We needed to make them laugh, raise their spirits and satirize the hell out of people who were trying to wipe us out.
When you see yourself in that footage, do you ask yourself, “Where did all that energy come from?”
I can relate to it. David sent some other clips that he didn’t use in the documentary. There’s some footage he shot in France in 1969 from our first tour that I was amazed to see. Our initial performance was supposed to have been “The Shrunken Head of Pancho Villa.” All we took was our trunk. We sent plans for the set.
We get there, and it’s still snowing. We walked into this place where we had to perform that night. The carpenters were just barely constructing a set with some sticks. It didn’t look like anything. Not only is it freezing, but there’s no set. How can we do that play here?
As it turns out, it was a blessing because the play did not work in France. Too much dialogue. We had to switch. At that moment, I said, “You know what? Just put up a curtain, and we’ll do the actos [brief skits].” Oh, they were relieved. They were overjoyed. They put up a curtain, and we put up our banner.
That was the luckiest break in my life because if we had done “Shrunken Head,” we would have been an absolute flop in France. But the tent was our meat. I saw videos of the performance for the first time, and [Daniel Valdez] is absolutely magnificent. His body work spoke to the whole audience. I asked him to improvise it. He did. It was amazing.
I saw that footage, and I said, “Damn, that was impressive.” Of all the other footage we have of the Teatro performing, that really hit me because I had never seen this energy before. Then I come out, and I’m talking to the crowd, and it’s the first time I didn’t recognize myself. I watched this video and said, “Good God, who is this guy?”
One of the more interesting sections was on the differing receptions “Zoot Suit” received as a stage play, first as a sold-out success in Los Angeles and then being critically panned in New York.
People really had no idea of what happened to “Zoot Suit” in New York. They knew it flopped in Broadway terminology, but I knew it hadn’t. I knew that we were a success, that our previews had standing ovations for many, many nights.
I felt that I ran into a wall, which is the Eastern Wall, New York, and there were “no entry” signs. Some of those critics were notoriously negative. John Simon is impossible. Was impossible. Rex Reed had his shtick. His idea was that he had to be a vicious New York critic in order to sustain his reputation.
I understand if it’s not their style or their cup of tea, okay. But that was our problem as the Teatro and my problem as an individual playwright. I was bringing work that these critics were not used to assessing in any way, and dealing with an experience where there was no way they could know more about it than I did.
Siskel and Ebert, when they reviewed “Zoot Suit” on their television program, gave it a thumbs-up but said it was a missed opportunity to represent the Mexican-American experience. My thought was, well, what do they know about the Mexican-American experience? And how can they judge my work on the basis of that? That seemed to me dishonest.
I think that we’re talking about cultural understanding. We’re talking about this huge country separated by 2,000 miles of continent. The East Coast is different than the West Coast, historically, politically, culturally and immigration-wise. It’s two different experiences.
Parts of the film revolve around your often-tense relationship with your older brother, Frank.
My brother and I were bonded by love and brotherhood, sure, but he was the firstborn. He ran into the wall first. Little brothers learn from their older brothers when they see them hit the wall. The wall that my brother hit was American society.
This documentary—believe it or not—is my way of grieving for him. I was not able to weep when he died because he didn’t tell us he had cancer. He kept it from us. Even told his son as he was dying, “Don’t tell the family. Don’t tell them for a year.”
Now, why would he do that? Maybe keep the memory alive for another year. I missed out on a very critical conversation with him about life and death. It’s important to be able to talk about it from time to time. Death has been a subject we’ve dealt with throughout the Teatro’s history. It’s just been there.
I was able to have a conversation with a friend who died three years ago, who was my best friend in the business. I saw him going into the last stages of his cancer. We were able to talk about Hollywood and life. We talked openly about death. But I didn’t have that opportunity with my own brother. I would have appreciated that.
Your character, El Pachuco, acts as the omniscient narrator of your life. What does he mean to you?
El Pachuco comes from a very particular experience. It must have been 1948, and we had moved into this old farmhouse, but it had no electricity at the beginning. I thought it was haunted, quite frankly.
My cousin, Billy Miranda, was a pachuco. I dedicated Zoot Suit to his memory because he was the one who introduced me to the term “Chicano.” I heard my mother and my aunt argue about whether we were Americans or Mexicans. Billy piped up, “Chale, I’m neither American nor Mexican. I’m a Chicano.” I heard that, and I said, “If he’s a Chicano, I must be a Chicano.”
Billy moved into my room. There were no lights. It was just dark. I was eight years old, and I could have sworn the ghosts were coming in. We were sleeping on an army cot, and I thought he was asleep. But I heard noises, and I was scared, and I started to cry in the dark.
I was choking down some tears, and I felt our life was coming to not a good time. In the dark, Billy’s voice piped up. He said, “Are you crying?” I said, “Nope.” And he said, “Take it easy. Everything’s fine.” I said, “Okay.”
That voice stayed with me even when he was no longer there. Whenever I got scared, I could almost hear El Pachuco. That became my inner voice. I lost my fear of the dark. Billy was the conduit for me, a kind of higher consciousness to overcome fear. It was a source of strength. Even when he died, he was still alive in me. With me was the spirit of El Pachuco. With me was Billy’s voice.
El Teatro Campesino will be screening “American Pachuco” on June 13, 14, 27 and 28, at 705 4th Street, San Juan Bautista. Tickets are available on Eventbrite.
Related Stories
We need your help. Support local, nonprofit news! BenitoLink is a nonprofit news website that reports on San Benito County. Our team is committed to this community and providing essential, accurate information to our fellow residents. Producing local news is expensive, and community support keeps the news flowing. Please consider supporting BenitoLink, San Benito County’s public service nonprofit news.
You must be logged in to post a comment.