More News

Cost to fix botched portion of State Route 25 jumps to $11.3 million

Residents are unhappy about the increase and that designs were drawn up before they could weigh in.
Caltrans Project Manager Brandy Rider (right) told residents that safety issues have not been solved because the realignment failed. Photo by John Chadwell.
John Eade (center) criticized Caltrans for spending $11.3 million on an eighth of a mile of State Route 25. Photo by John Chadwell.
Caltrans engineer Steve McDonald (center) took notes on residents' concerns. Photo by John Chadwell.
First new design taking into consideration the Native American cultural site.
Second new design, if the Native American site is exempt from protection.

About 25 South County residents attended a March 18 community input meeting at the Inn at Tres Pinos to listen to Supervisor Jim Gillio and Caltrans representatives discuss plans for the State Route 25 Curve Restoration Project.

Residents learned that the project cost was increasing 18.95 percent, from the previously reported $9.5 million to $11.3 million; they also learned that engineering plans were already drawn up.

However, Gillio said there was still time for residents to have their ideas taken into consideration.

Caltrans Project Manager Brandy Rider said, “The project is still in early design, so there are opportunities to input into the plan. We have to program out dollars, so we have to make an estimate of what we think we’ll need in order to build the project. We need to move forward because we have a continuing safety issue.”

The original project was undertaken in 2015 to address safety on the two-lane scenic route just below the entrance to Pinnacles National Park. The California Highway Patrol had identified it as the site of numerous fatal crashes. The severe grade of the cut through a hillside came about because of habitat concerns for the California Tiger Salamander, a grove of large oaks, and a Native American site which, Rider said, federal law prevents her from identifying out of concern for theft or vandalism.

Rider said environmental studies must be completed, and there is the need to determine the future of a “cultural resource” or Native American site.

Rider showed two curve restoration project designs to residents. One had a gentler slope than the present cut, leaving much of the hill still intact. The second was flat, totally removing the hill and whatever may be buried there. Rider said the second design could only be used if the cultural resource was exempt from protection.

Rancher John Eade more or less captured the mood of the meeting.

“We just voted in a $500 million tax increase with Measure G,” he said. “We’re supposed to take $250 million of that and build Highway 25. This same outfit that will squander $20 million by the time they’re finished for an eighth of a mile down near the Pinnacles is going to be in charge of that eight miles we’ve got to build up there. By the time they get done with their five-to-one Caltrans ratio, we’ll spend $1.5 billion. That’s what I’m concerned about.”

Caltrans engineers designed the original hillside cut and contracted the work out to John Madonna Construction in San Luis Obispo. The cut hill collapsed a few months after it was completed, at which point Caltrans rerouted traffic around the hill along the same path of the original road.

According to rancher Steve Taylor, Madonna told him and others that the design was bad, the two slopes were unstable, and that Caltrans would not listen to him.

During the March 18 meeting, both Rider and engineer Steve McDonald said the collapse was Caltrans’ fault because engineers did not take deep enough core samples and assumed the hill was made up of similar rock as nearby hills. McDonald said even though the cost of repairing the road seemed high, he told those at the meeting that the cost would be much higher if there was an accident there because “Caltrans always loses lawsuits.”

Gillio said he wasn’t a supervisor at the time of the collapse, but wished he had paid more attention in 2015 to what was happening at the location on State Route 25.

“We are where we are now and that’s why I’m having this meeting to get the information from Caltrans directly to you so there aren’t rumors out there, and to provide Caltrans feedback so we can get the best design possible,” Gillio said. “They need to fix this issue. They caused it.”

 

Other related BenitoLink articles:

https://benitolink.com/news/caltrans-aims-fix-state-route-25-again-95-million-price-tag

https://benitolink.com/apparently-faulty-engineering-caused-cave-hwy-25-realignment-project

 

BenitoLink Logo

Become a Member Today

Support your local independent news.

We work hard to give you the news and information you need. By becoming a member, you will be part of something bigger; BenitoLink, your community-supported news source.

Donate

John Chadwell's picture
About:
John Chadwell (John Chadwell)

John Chadwell is an investigative reporter for BenitoLink. He has many years experience as a freelance photojournalist, copywriter, ghostwriter, scriptwriter and novelist. He is a former U.S. Navy Combat Photojournalist and is an award-winning writer who has worked for magazine, newspapers, radio and television. He has a BA in Journalism and Mass Communications from Chapman University and underwent graduate studies at USC Cinema School. John has worked as a script doctor and his own script, God's Club, was released as a motion picture in 2016. He has also written eight novels, ranging from science fiction to true crime that are sold on Amazon. To contact John Chadwell, send an email to: johnchadwell@benitolink.com.

Comments

Submitted by (john) on

Turn the turn, leave it alone. Spend the money on 101 and 25

Submitted by (BJM) on

Speed bumps, or a bunch of bumpy dots. The intent is to make it safe, bumps will force cars to slow down. Isn't that better than spending more of our millions upon millions and tearing up more land? Simple cheap fix, bumps. We don't always need to throw millions at a problem.

.

Add new comment

Add Facebook comment

Comment using your Facebook account. Facebook comments will be published on this page, and on Facebook. It will not be posted to the "Recent Comments" list on the BenitoLink front page.