More News

Statewide crime initiative gains local support

A statewide initiative to change portions of three crime-related laws is picking up steam in the local region.

The Reducing Crime and Keeping California Safe Act of 2018 would change parts of Proposition 47, Proposition 57, and Assembly Bill 109 to reclassify certain “nonviolent” crimes as “violent” to prevent the early release of inmates convicted of crimes such as assault on a peace officer, rape of an unconscious person or by intoxication, and human trafficking of a child. A complete list of the purported “nonviolent” crimes can be found at the initiative’s website at

The initiative is spearheaded by the California Public Safety Partnership, a nonprofit organization that states it is a coalition of crime victims, law enforcement, business, labor, and child advocates working toward effective solutions to crime and violence. It is supported by groups including the Peace Officers Research Association of California, California District Attorneys Association, and the California Police Chiefs Association.

Additionally, the initiative strives to reform parts of the parole system to stop the early release of violent felons, expand parolee oversight, strengthen penalties for parole violations, reform theft laws, and expand DNA collection related to drug, theft, domestic violence, and other crimes. It needs 365,880 signatures by August to qualify for the November election.

“Proposition 47, 57, and AB109 had worthy goals of trying to combat mass incarceration and provide some sort of rehabilitation in the penal system so that when people are released to communities, they are able to assimilate, get jobs, and live a normal life outside of crime,” Hollister Councilman Jim Gillio said. “Unfortunately, there have been several unintended consequences.”

Earlier this month, the Hollister City Council unanimously adopted a support resolution brought forward by Gillio, a former officer with the Gilroy Police Department, and Hollister Police Department Captain Carlos Reynoso. The cities of Gilroy and Morgan Hill recently adopted similar support resolutions as well.

“Several of these crimes are now eligible for early release and are not considered ‘violent’ crimes,” Gillio said. “What this initiative will do is make sure that these specific violent crimes are still considered violent and are not eligible for early release.”

In November 2014, California voters approved Proposition 47 that reduced certain drug possession felonies to misdemeanors and required misdemeanor sentencing for petty theft, receiving stolen property, and forging/writing bad checks to the amount of $950 or less. Prior to Prop 47, the threshold for felony theft was $450.

“It used to be in the past when someone stole something over $450 in value it was a felony,” Gillio said. “Now let’s say, for example, someone walks into a retail store, a small business, or a residence. They steal under $950, essentially that is treated as a non-bookable misdemeanor. Anything under $950 is treated like a citable misdemeanor.”

State voters approved Proposition 57 in November 2016. The proposition allowed parole consideration for nonviolent felons, authorized credit-earning opportunities for good behavior, and changed some juvenile prosecution policies.

According to the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Proposition 57 moved up parole consideration for nonviolent offenders who served the full term of a primary offense sentence and demonstrated their release to the community would not pose an unreasonable risk of violence.

“It’s likely we all agree that incarceration does not change the long-term behavior for everyone that goes to jail,” San Benito County Sheriff Darren Thompson said. “Californians want to see additional systems and measures in place to change bad behavior.”

Thompson said that although Californians want to see more treatment programs offered to address root problems, some incarceration is necessary to prevent further victimization of society.

"In some cases, incarceration is even necessary to protect those with dangerous addictions from their own actions," Thompson said. "A short stay in a local jail can be the interruption to their drug usage that saves their own life. I recently heard a recovering heroin user explain that custody prevented him from an eventual catastrophic health crisis or overdose."

Thompson continued.

“Prop 47, Prop 57, and AB109 were designed to reduce incarceration, not to reduce crime. Collectively, they go too far. Some adjustments are needed. The Reducing Crime and Keeping California Safe Act of 2018 will accomplish a lot for us.”

For more information on the Reducing Crime and Keeping California Safe Act of 2018, visit


BenitoLink Logo

Become a Member Today

Support your local independent news.

We work hard to give you the news and information you need. By becoming a member, you will be part of something bigger; BenitoLink, your community-supported news source.


nicholaspreciado's picture
Nicholas Preciado (nicholaspreciado)

Nicholas Preciado is content manager for BenitoLink, as well as a writer, editor, and journalist. He previously worked at the Hollister Free Lance, Gilroy Dispatch, and Morgan Hill Times newspapers. Nick graduated from Humboldt State University in 2013 with a B.A. in English Writing Practices and a minor in journalism.


Submitted by (teresa marie) on

Why are we not looking at the enhancements as a way to reduce incarceration? It seems that these can sometimes double the length of the sentence.

Submitted by (Will Lam) on

Overturn this BS law

Submitted by (Robert Curtis) on

With the recidivism rates so low seems our probation and parole systems are currently working and for those on the sex offender registry recidivism rates are only .06% according to the California Sex Offender Management Board and the Department of Corrections. So why not give Prop. 57 a chance before adding restrictions/limitations?

Add new comment

Add Facebook comment

Comment using your Facebook account. Facebook comments will be published on this page, and on Facebook. It will not be posted to the "Recent Comments" list on the BenitoLink front page.