Business / Economy

COMMENTARY: Part I: Property taxes – the size of the pies

Property tax issues can be confusing

One of the reasons people do not understand how the property tax system works in California is that it has more nooks and crannies than then a good English muffin. Most explanations tend to address all of them. In this series I’m going to try and simplify the issue by skipping some of the more complex parts; the old adage applies, follow the money and you will have a basic understanding of the system; I will follow most of the money.

Total state general property tax levies (property tax bills) in 2013-2014 were $52 billion providing a basic funding stream to cities, counties, schools, and other districts. Each county generates a property tax levy based on assessed values, the tax rate, and other factors. For comparison, all state sales and use taxes generate about $48 billion annually and the state personal income tax generates $77 billion; therefore, property taxes are a significant source of funding.

There are two key components of this county-based system. The first is the size of the pie – how much money counties collect in property taxes; the second is how it is distributed. In this part, Part I, I will explain the size of the pie both in absolute (dollars) and relative (dollars per capita) terms.  In following parts I will discuss how the money is distributed and other things. 

The size of the property tax pie available to each county is determined by two variables; the values of the properties and the average property tax rate.  While the basic tax rate is 1 percent of the assessed property value (I’m not going into assessments or exemptions), counties can vote to add to that rate. The average property tax rates in the state vary from 1.000 percent to 1.222 percent. The average of all 58 counties was 1.093 percent.

Once you have the size of the county pie a simple per capita calculation can show how much tax is available to support each resident or what I call the relative value. If two counties have the same tax levy (pie), but one has twice the population, they will have half the money to spend per resident.

Last year the total tax levy in each county (the assessed value times the tax rate) ranged from the low of $5.1 million for Sierra County to the high of $13.4 billion for Los Angeles, 2,627 times as much as Sierra.

Here are some more 2013-2014 tax rates and the total tax levies by county in the bay area: San Francisco, 1.188 percent, $2.4 billion; Solano, 1.116 percent, $473.7 million, Napa, 1.101 percent, $324.3 million; and San Benito, 1.152 percent, $68.3 million. 

San Benito County has the fifth highest property tax rate of the 12 Bay Area counties, but the lowest tax levy by far because it has the lowest total property value.  Napa has the second lowest tax levy, but it was still 4.7 times the levy of San Benito County. San Benito's tax levy was number 40 of California’s 58 counties.

Comparing the levies in Sierra County to Los Angeles obviously does not make sense, to compare them one must control for population.  Taking the total tax levies and dividing them by the county population gives you an idea the size of the tax pie available to support each resident.  In that case Sierra County (pop. 3,089) has $1,659 per capita while Los Angeles (pop. >10 million), has $1,338 per capita. On a property tax basis alone – without regard to other taxes or costs – Sierra County generates a larger pie per resident than Los Angeles.  

This is a very useful indicator of relative economic condition of a county’s property, but it is not used for any actual tax purposes. Here is the result of my calculations using the population estimates from January, 2014: San Francisco, $2,449 per capita; Solano, $1,117; Napa, $2,328; and San Benito, $1,189.

San Benito County with the smallest population in the bay area, 57,500, closes ground on some other counties, such as Solano, Santa Cruz, and Monterey with larger populations, but we are still near the bottom of the Bay Area counties, number 11 out of the 12.  We do better when compared to the entire state, and number 30 on a per capita basis  – right about the middle.

However, the gaps adds up; for example, the $350 per capita difference between San Benito and the higher per capita in Sonoma, does not seem much, but it comes out to more than $20 million a year.

Now we have established the size of a county’s property tax pie and a way to compare them; next time we will deal with who gets how big of a slice – that is also highly variable.

See you then…


Marty Richman

Born and raised in Brooklyn, NY, Marty (Martin G.) spent his teen years in northern New Jersey. He served more than 22 years on active military duty, mostly in Europe, and is a retired U.S. Army Chief Warrant Officer 4, Nuclear Weapons Technical Officer. Marty then worked 25 years in various engineering and management positions in the electronics and energetic materials industries supporting the communications, computer, aerospace, defense and automotive sectors. He is a graduate, summa cum laude, from The College of Hard Knocks, among his numerous awards and accomplishments. He was a regular weekly Op/Ed columnist and feature writer for The Hollister Free Lance for seven years and a member of its editorial board for five years. Marty is a frequent commentator and contributor to BenitoLink on a wide variety of local, state, national and international subjects.   Marty was elected to represent the City of Hollister District 4 on the City Council in November, 2018. Marty and his wife, Joyce, have been residents of Hollister since 1996.